Examiner Thomas P Ingram

Grant ratio: 81.3% (88th percentile in Art Unit 3668 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 81.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88969
Primary art unit
3668
Work group
3660
Technology center
3600
Applications
589
Granted applications
479
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7864
Supervisor
Fadey Jabr
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1516

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 57.9% 1.80
Group 454 54.1% 1.86
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.61 948 office actions across 589 applications
Applications with office actions 98.5% 580 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.5%
1 OA 395 67.1%
2 OAs 94 16.0%
3 OAs 41 7.0%
4 OAs 32 5.4%
5+ OAs 18 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 69.0% 2013 2014: 70.6% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 79.5% 2016 2017: 86.3% 2017 2018: 92.2% 2018 2019: 92.9% 2019 2020: 90.7% 2020 2021: 94.4% 2021 2022: 90.5% 2022 2023: 97.6% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201255100.0%
2013292069.0%
2014342470.6%
2015271866.7%
2016393179.5%
2017514486.3%
2018514792.2%
2019565292.9%
2020544990.7%
2021545194.4%
2022423890.5%
2023414097.6%
2024423685.7%
2025442454.5%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 580 13.4% 8.8% 64.8% 2.9%
Action 2 185 10.3% 3.8% 83.8% 0.5%
Action 3 91 6.6% 0.0% 91.2% 0.0%
Action 4 50 8.0% 0.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 19.5% 24 of 123 office actions
All years 11.7% 111 of 948 office actions
Change +7.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.9%
21.9%
18.1%
15.9%
2019: PEG
5.8%
8.1%
11.4%
27.7%
18.2%
2024: AI examples
23.3%
2025: August memo
11.4%
31.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 30, 2019 15/067,877 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Apr. 11, 2019 14/081,945 Affirmed §101
Jan. 14, 2019 14/282,015 Affirmed in part §101 · §103
Mar. 20, 2018 13/981,748 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Dec. 6, 2017 13/195,403 Affirmed §103
Nov. 17, 2017 13/714,919 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2017 13/022,806 Affirmed §103
Mar. 27, 2017 13/191,823 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 14, 2016 13/158,983 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.