Examiner Lail Kleinman

Grant ratio: 59.2% (46th percentile in Art Unit 3668 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 59.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89111
Primary art unit
3668
Work group
3660
Technology center
3600
Applications
473
Granted applications
280
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6286
Supervisor
Fadey Jabr
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1516

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 57.9% 1.80
Group 454 54.1% 1.86
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 1,106 office actions across 473 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 465 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.7%
1 OA 183 38.7%
2 OAs 124 26.2%
3 OAs 58 12.3%
4 OAs 50 10.6%
5+ OAs 50 10.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 44.4% 2013 2014: 69.0% 2014 2015: 63.6% 2015 2016: 72.7% 2016 2017: 73.2% 2017 2018: 81.8% 2018 2019: 78.4% 2019 2020: 78.8% 2020 2021: 50.0% 2021 2022: 63.3% 2022 2023: 73.1% 2023 2024: 59.5% 2024 2025: 22.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20123133.3%
201318844.4%
2014292069.0%
2015332163.6%
2016443272.7%
2017413073.2%
2018443681.8%
2019372978.4%
2020332678.8%
202114750.0%
2022301963.3%
2023261973.1%
2024372259.5%
2025451022.2%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 465 6.0% 9.2% 70.8% 8.2%
Action 2 282 4.3% 4.6% 85.1% 3.9%
Action 3 158 5.1% 2.5% 86.1% 6.3%
Action 4 100 5.0% 2.0% 85.0% 7.0%
Action 5 50 4.0% 0.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 6.3% 15 of 240 office actions
All years 5.0% 55 of 1,106 office actions
Change +1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
1.3%
2.5%
3.5%
5.5%
6.7%
2019: PEG
2.4%
1.4%
17.1%
13.8%
4.3%
2024: AI examples
2.3%
2025: August memo
8.4%
10.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 10/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2026 17/997,149 Reversed §103
Jan. 22, 2026 17/796,710 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2020 14/309,252 Affirmed §112
Mar. 2, 2020 15/340,817 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2019 13/637,529 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Nov. 27, 2018 13/512,714 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2018 14/448,923 Reversed §103
Sep. 24, 2018 14/299,513 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jun. 25, 2018 14/197,323 Reversed §102
Nov. 15, 2017 13/587,798 Reversed §103
Jan. 25, 2017 13/574,150 Reversed §102
May. 3, 2016 13/195,651 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.