Examiner Angelina M Shudy

Grant ratio: 67.6% (54th percentile in Art Unit 3668 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90211
Primary art unit
3668
Work group
3660
Technology center
3600
Applications
494
Granted applications
334
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6757
Supervisor
Fadey Jabr
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1516

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 57.9% 1.80
Group 454 54.1% 1.86
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.03 1,005 office actions across 494 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 493 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 225 45.5%
2 OAs 148 30.0%
3 OAs 57 11.5%
4 OAs 33 6.7%
5+ OAs 30 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 58.3% 2013 2014: 81.3% 2014 2015: 84.0% 2015 2016: 70.5% 2016 2017: 45.8% 2017 2018: 80.5% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 78.8% 2020 2021: 97.4% 2021 2022: 68.6% 2022 2023: 80.6% 2023 2024: 70.7% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013241458.3%
2014322681.3%
2015252184.0%
2016443170.5%
2017241145.8%
2018413380.5%
2019403280.0%
2020332678.8%
2021393897.4%
2022352468.6%
2023312580.6%
2024412970.7%
2025542444.4%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 493 4.5% 7.7% 77.3% 7.5%
Action 2 268 5.2% 3.7% 82.5% 7.1%
Action 3 120 7.5% 5.0% 78.3% 5.8%
Action 4 63 3.2% 0.0% 82.5% 9.5%
Action 5 30 3.3% 3.3% 76.7% 10.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 6.3% 68.8% 12.5%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 9.6% 23 of 239 office actions
All years 4.8% 48 of 1,005 office actions
Change +4.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.6%
2014: Alice
5.4%
0.0%
2.3%
1.2%
2.8%
2019: PEG
1.7%
0.0%
5.9%
7.3%
9.5%
2024: AI examples
9.5%
2025: August memo
11.1%
5.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 20, 2026 18/199,619 Affirmed §101
Jul. 22, 2024 16/794,209 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 19, 2021 14/965,298 Affirmed §101
Nov. 19, 2019 14/994,606 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Oct. 2, 2018 14/511,504 Affirmed §103
Aug. 21, 2018 14/176,293 Reversed §103
Oct. 23, 2017 14/133,726 Affirmed §103
Jun. 30, 2017 13/713,076 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 26, 2017 13/893,558 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.