AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jonathan Malikasim

Examiner Jonathan Malikasim appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 71.2%, they average 2.06 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.06
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(313) 446-6597
Predicted Supervisor
Amy Weisberg
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5500
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3670 - Wells, Earth Boring/Moving, Mining, Harvesters, Bridges, Roads, Petroleum

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
385
Granted Applications
274
Non-Granted Applications
111
Avg OA / Grant
2.06
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3612 , 3645 , 3672
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 71.2% 2.06
Art Unit 28 72.4% 1.68
Group 235 60.7% 1.84
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 4 1 25.0%
2017 44 27 61.4%
2018 34 27 79.4%
2019 44 31 70.5%
2020 46 33 71.7%
2021 53 45 84.9%
2022 65 60 92.3%
2023 47 41 87.2%
2024 9 9 100.0%
2025 20 0 0.0%
2026 19 0 0.0%

274 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 395 0.8% 5.6% 72.2% 20.3%
2 203 2.5% 3.9% 79.8% 13.3%
3 104 1.9% 1.9% 88.5% 7.7%
4 49 4.1% 2.0% 87.8% 4.1%
5 22 0.0% 9.1% 72.7% 18.2%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.9%
2020
1.0%
2021
4.2%
2022
3.7%
2023
10.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.