Examiner David E. Sosnowski

Grant ratio: 58.7% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 3673 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.92. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.92
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88176
Primary art unit
3673
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
385
Granted applications
226
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7944
Supervisor
Justin Mikowski
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8525

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 52.8% 1.84
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 713 office actions across 387 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 387 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 213 55.0%
2 OAs 104 26.9%
3 OAs 32 8.3%
4 OAs 19 4.9%
5+ OAs 19 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 68.9% 2012 2013: 57.7% 2013 2014: 64.6% 2014 2015: 78.2% 2015 2016: 63.2% 2016 2017: 85.0% 2017 2021: 20.0% 2021 2025: 34.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
201033100.0%
2011423583.3%
2012614268.9%
2013523057.7%
2014483164.6%
2015554378.2%
2016191263.2%
2017201785.0%
20215120.0%
2025321134.4%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 387 0.5% 38.0% 47.0% 8.3%
Action 2 174 0.6% 31.0% 58.0% 8.0%
Action 3 70 0.0% 24.3% 71.4% 4.3%
Action 4 38 0.0% 21.1% 76.3% 2.6%
Action 5 19 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 99 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 713 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.8%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 21. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 7 affirmed in part, and 10 reversed.

Full reversal rate
47.6% 10/21 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
81.0% 17/21 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 6, 2022 16/222,166 Reversed §102
Dec. 12, 2018 13/917,809 Affirmed in part §102
Oct. 27, 2017 12/792,836 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jan. 26, 2017 12/901,298 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 13, 2016 10/579,069 Reversed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 12/701,042 Reversed §102 · §112
Apr. 20, 2016 12/505,697 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 12, 2016 13/290,317 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 22, 2016 13/009,948 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 6, 2015 13/327,175 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 30, 2014 13/099,803 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 30, 2014 13/013,027 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.