Examiner Faria F Ahmad

Grant ratio: 69.0% (70th percentile in Art Unit 3675 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.39. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.39
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88312
Primary art unit
3675
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
665
Granted applications
459
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1334
Supervisor
Christine M. Mills
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8322

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 53.1% 2.10
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 1,536 office actions across 665 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 659 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.9%
1 OA 250 37.6%
2 OAs 207 31.1%
3 OAs 79 11.9%
4 OAs 57 8.6%
5+ OAs 66 9.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 58.5% 2013 2014: 68.6% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 85.2% 2016 2017: 64.7% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 90.7% 2020 2021: 88.2% 2021 2022: 77.8% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 83.6% 2024 2025: 47.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
2012211466.7%
2013412458.5%
2014352468.6%
2015483266.7%
2016272385.2%
2017513364.7%
2018483675.0%
2019564275.0%
2020433990.7%
2021514588.2%
2022544277.8%
2023483675.0%
2024615183.6%
2025361747.2%
20264400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 659 1.1% 18.7% 61.8% 12.6%
Action 2 409 0.2% 20.8% 67.0% 7.1%
Action 3 202 0.0% 18.8% 72.3% 5.0%
Action 4 123 0.0% 13.0% 80.5% 3.3%
Action 5 66 0.0% 10.6% 78.8% 4.5%
Action 6 39 0.0% 20.5% 71.8% 2.6%
Action 7 19 0.0% 21.1% 68.4% 10.5%
Action 8 12 0.0% 8.3% 75.0% 16.7%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 3 of 259 office actions
All years 0.5% 8 of 1,536 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.3%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 29, 2026 17/154,757 Reversed §103
Mar. 27, 2023 16/819,698 Affirmed §103
Mar. 8, 2022 15/874,589 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 2, 2020 15/010,942 Reversed §103
Dec. 20, 2019 14/449,003 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.