Examiner Yong-Suk (Philip) Ro

Grant ratio: 82.8% (79th percentile in Art Unit 3676 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85172
Primary art unit
3676
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,305
Granted applications
1,081
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5466
Supervisor
Tara Schimpf
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7741

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 64.5% 1.88
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.52 1,988 office actions across 1,306 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,306 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 877 67.2%
2 OAs 267 20.4%
3 OAs 103 7.9%
4 OAs 40 3.1%
5+ OAs 19 1.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 79.0% 2009 2010: 77.6% 2010 2011: 90.0% 2011 2012: 79.1% 2012 2013: 87.3% 2013 2014: 92.4% 2014 2015: 90.9% 2015 2016: 85.3% 2016 2017: 83.0% 2017 2018: 88.5% 2018 2019: 93.8% 2019 2020: 81.4% 2020 2021: 89.5% 2021 2022: 93.0% 2022 2023: 89.8% 2023 2024: 89.7% 2024 2025: 47.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200812433.3%
2009624979.0%
2010584577.6%
2011605490.0%
2012675379.1%
20131028987.3%
20141059792.4%
2015888090.9%
20161028785.3%
20171008383.0%
20181049288.5%
2019656193.8%
2020705781.4%
2021575189.5%
2022575393.0%
2023494489.8%
2024585289.7%
2025633047.6%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,306 0.2% 25.1% 53.7% 14.7%
Action 2 429 0.0% 20.3% 61.8% 8.4%
Action 3 162 0.0% 19.8% 71.6% 5.6%
Action 4 59 0.0% 28.8% 62.7% 6.8%
Action 5 19 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 22.2% 66.7% 11.1%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 220 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,988 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 19, 2016 12/744,082 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 7, 2015 10/574,998 Affirmed §103
Mar. 23, 2015 12/710,748 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 25, 2013 12/127,881 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jan. 22, 2013 11/739,284 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.