Examiner Elizabeth Gitlin

Grant ratio: 66.4% (36th percentile in Art Unit 3676 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.68. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2016
Grant ratio 66.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.68
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85188
Primary art unit
3676
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
345
Granted applications
229

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 63.7% 1.88
Group 240 57.7% 1.84
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.56 883 office actions across 345 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 345 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 93 27.0%
2 OAs 115 33.3%
3 OAs 57 16.5%
4 OAs 49 14.2%
5+ OAs 31 9.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 62.5% 2008 2009: 54.3% 2009 2010: 58.1% 2010 2011: 46.9% 2011 2012: 67.4% 2012 2013: 78.6% 2013 2014: 75.5% 2014 2015: 65.9% 2015 2016: 82.4% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20088562.5%
2009462554.3%
2010432558.1%
2011321546.9%
2012432967.4%
2013423378.6%
2014534075.5%
2015442965.9%
2016342882.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 345 0.6% 15.9% 73.6% 4.3%
Action 2 252 0.0% 13.9% 81.7% 2.4%
Action 3 137 0.0% 13.9% 80.3% 5.1%
Action 4 80 0.0% 12.5% 83.8% 3.8%
Action 5 31 0.0% 9.7% 90.3% 0.0%
Action 6 19 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 883 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 28, 2016 12/934,918 Reversed §103
Sep. 7, 2016 11/952,238 Affirmed §103
Mar. 30, 2016 13/028,474 Reversed §103
Jul. 31, 2015 12/140,368 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 10, 2013 11/748,280 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Apr. 30, 2013 11/830,504 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.