Examiner Neel G Patel

Grant ratio: 47.1% (21st percentile in Art Unit 3676 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.42. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 47.1%
Average office actions / grant 3.42
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93576
Primary art unit
3676
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
325
Granted applications
153
Examiner phone
(469) 295-9168
Supervisor
Tara Schimpf
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7741

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 64.5% 1.88
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.17 1,030 office actions across 325 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 325 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 90 27.7%
2 OAs 68 20.9%
3 OAs 37 11.4%
4 OAs 49 15.1%
5+ OAs 81 24.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 18.2% 2017 2018: 6.3% 2018 2019: 40.0% 2019 2020: 26.3% 2020 2021: 76.1% 2021 2022: 84.6% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 76.5% 2024 2025: 39.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201711218.2%
20181616.3%
2019351440.0%
2020381026.3%
2021463576.1%
2022262284.6%
2023353085.7%
2024342676.5%
2025331339.4%
20265100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 325 0.3% 7.1% 87.1% 3.7%
Action 2 235 0.0% 4.7% 90.2% 4.3%
Action 3 167 0.6% 3.0% 91.6% 4.8%
Action 4 130 0.0% 2.3% 94.6% 3.1%
Action 5 81 0.0% 2.5% 93.8% 3.7%
Action 6 54 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 1.9%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 5.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 277 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,030 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 18. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 14 reversed.

Full reversal rate
77.8% 14/18 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
77.8% 14/18 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 10, 2025 16/595,259 Reversed §100 · §103 · §120
Nov. 9, 2022 16/256,690 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Jul. 19, 2022 15/527,293 Reversed §103
Jan. 26, 2022 15/116,585 Reversed §103
Dec. 17, 2021 15/109,928 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 26, 2021 15/274,892 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 26, 2021 15/274,916 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Jul. 28, 2021 15/274,851 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 14, 2021 15/029,279 Reversed §103
Jun. 28, 2021 14/667,026 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 21, 2021 14/430,668 Reversed §103
May. 28, 2021 15/116,412 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.