Examiner Gary Estremsky

Grant ratio: 75.5% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 3677 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2025
Grant ratio 75.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
72420
Primary art unit
3677
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,294
Granted applications
977

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 51.8% 1.71
Group 238 58.8% 1.84
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 2,401 office actions across 1,307 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,307 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 664 50.8%
2 OAs 382 29.2%
3 OAs 148 11.3%
4 OAs 71 5.4%
5+ OAs 42 3.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 69.5% 2008 2009: 61.2% 2009 2010: 67.9% 2010 2011: 75.7% 2011 2012: 75.7% 2012 2013: 74.4% 2013 2014: 76.6% 2014 2015: 80.3% 2015 2016: 78.7% 2016 2017: 73.2% 2017 2018: 77.5% 2018 2019: 82.1% 2019 2020: 80.3% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 81.7% 2022 2023: 70.9% 2023 2024: 77.6% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008825769.5%
2009986061.2%
2010785367.9%
2011705375.7%
2012745675.7%
2013826174.4%
2014947276.6%
2015766180.3%
2016755978.7%
2017826073.2%
2018806277.5%
2019846982.1%
2020665380.3%
2021696087.0%
2022604981.7%
2023553970.9%
2024675277.6%
20252150.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,307 0.0% 26.1% 54.7% 12.7%
Action 2 643 0.2% 23.8% 50.1% 18.5%
Action 3 261 0.0% 23.4% 49.0% 19.9%
Action 4 113 0.0% 17.7% 59.3% 17.7%
Action 5 42 0.0% 26.2% 52.4% 16.7%
Action 6 20 0.0% 10.0% 65.0% 15.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 42.9% 57.1% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 148 office actions
All years 0.0% 1 of 2,401 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 10, 2025 18/126,772 Affirmed §103
Aug. 22, 2018 13/963,421 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 30, 2015 12/521,961 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 31, 2013 10/524,811 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.