Examiner Matthieu Setliff

Grant ratio: 55.7% (37th percentile in Art Unit 3679 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.38. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2019
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.38
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87768
Primary art unit
3679
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
469
Granted applications
261

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 57.1% 1.98
Group 240 57.7% 1.84
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.28 1,078 office actions across 473 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 473 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 156 33.0%
2 OAs 161 34.0%
3 OAs 79 16.7%
4 OAs 48 10.1%
5+ OAs 29 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 69.0% 2011 2012: 75.3% 2012 2013: 42.9% 2013 2014: 52.4% 2014 2015: 35.0% 2015 2016: 52.5% 2016 2017: 59.4% 2017 2018: 48.1% 2018 2019: 64.2% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011292069.0%
2012775875.3%
2013492142.9%
2014422252.4%
2015602135.0%
2016593152.5%
2017321959.4%
2018542648.1%
2019674364.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 473 0.0% 36.4% 59.8% 2.7%
Action 2 317 0.0% 37.9% 56.2% 4.4%
Action 3 156 0.0% 32.7% 63.5% 3.2%
Action 4 77 0.0% 28.6% 66.2% 5.2%
Action 5 29 0.0% 27.6% 69.0% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 14.3% 71.4% 14.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,078 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 6/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2020 15/046,898 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 30, 2020 15/145,316 Affirmed §102
May. 13, 2019 14/712,373 Reversed N/A
Jan. 22, 2019 13/845,012 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 16, 2018 14/059,704 Reversed §103
Feb. 2, 2018 13/823,989 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Aug. 17, 2017 13/508,492 Reversed §103
Aug. 16, 2017 13/550,959 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 21, 2016 12/593,198 Affirmed §103
Sep. 23, 2016 13/238,384 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.