Examiner Aaron L Lembo

Grant ratio: 74.0% (80th percentile in Art Unit 3679 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 74.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.78
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88137
Primary art unit
3679
Work group
3670
Technology center
3600
Applications
884
Granted applications
654
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3065
Supervisor
Nicole Coy
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5405

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 57.1% 1.98
Group 240 57.7% 1.84
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.73 1,530 office actions across 884 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 884 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 494 55.9%
2 OAs 247 27.9%
3 OAs 72 8.1%
4 OAs 49 5.5%
5+ OAs 22 2.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 63.2% 2011 2012: 64.0% 2012 2013: 78.4% 2013 2014: 70.6% 2014 2015: 84.6% 2015 2016: 85.7% 2016 2017: 73.1% 2017 2018: 79.7% 2018 2019: 82.8% 2019 2020: 80.0% 2020 2021: 83.0% 2021 2022: 98.3% 2022 2023: 89.5% 2023 2024: 90.2% 2024 2025: 45.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011191263.2%
2012503264.0%
2013514078.4%
2014684870.6%
2015655584.6%
2016706085.7%
2017523873.1%
2018695579.7%
2019645382.8%
2020705680.0%
2021534483.0%
2022605998.3%
2023383489.5%
2024514690.2%
2025482245.8%
20265600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 884 0.6% 15.5% 75.1% 5.9%
Action 2 390 0.3% 11.8% 82.6% 3.8%
Action 3 143 0.0% 10.5% 84.6% 2.1%
Action 4 71 0.0% 8.5% 87.3% 4.2%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 86.4% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 14.3% 78.6% 7.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 4 of 191 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,530 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.9%
2025: August memo
1.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 26, 2016 12/668,882 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Oct. 8, 2015 12/755,565 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.