Examiner Thomas Dixon

Grant ratio: 49.8% (75th percentile in Art Unit 3684 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.87. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2017
Grant ratio 49.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.87
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83662
Primary art unit
3684
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
321
Granted applications
160

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 35.8% 2.38
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.83 907 office actions across 321 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 321 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 91 28.3%
2 OAs 75 23.4%
3 OAs 60 18.7%
4 OAs 46 14.3%
5+ OAs 49 15.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 22.7% 2008 2009: 59.4% 2009 2010: 58.8% 2010 2011: 52.6% 2011 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 79.4% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 8.6% 2016 2017: 33.3% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200822522.7%
2009321959.4%
2010513058.8%
2011382052.6%
2012665583.3%
2013342779.4%
20142200.0%
20151800.0%
20163538.6%
20173133.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 321 2.2% 34.9% 61.4% 0.6%
Action 2 230 0.0% 19.6% 78.3% 1.3%
Action 3 155 3.2% 9.0% 85.8% 0.6%
Action 4 95 1.1% 8.4% 88.4% 1.1%
Action 5 49 2.0% 4.1% 91.8% 2.0%
Action 6 27 11.1% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 16 12.5% 0.0% 81.3% 0.0%
Action 8 6 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 2.3% 21 of 907 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.8%
1.8%
4.0%
4.6%
2014: Alice
4.3%
6.6%
4.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 24. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 13 reversed.

Full reversal rate
56.5% 13/23 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
65.2% 15/23 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.5 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 27, 2017 13/760,863 Affirmed §101 · §102
Jan. 31, 2017 13/118,607 Reversed §103
Feb. 23, 2015 11/967,627 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 29, 2014 11/684,004 Affirmed §102
Mar. 24, 2014 11/836,892 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 6, 2014 11/789,331 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §112
Sep. 19, 2013 10/786,706 Reversed N/A
Sep. 5, 2013 12/183,431 Reversed §102
Sep. 4, 2013 11/617,634 Reversed §103
Aug. 28, 2013 12/002,917 Reversed §103
Apr. 30, 2013 11/836,945 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 5, 2013 11/284,535 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.