Examiner Ming Shui

Grant ratio: 48.5% (70th percentile in Art Unit 3684 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.59
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91656
Primary art unit
3684
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
369
Granted applications
179
Examiner phone
(303) 297-4247
Supervisor
Greg Morse
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3838

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 35.8% 2.38
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.33 859 office actions across 369 applications
Applications with office actions 96.7% 357 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 3.3%
1 OA 135 36.6%
2 OAs 98 26.6%
3 OAs 47 12.7%
4 OAs 39 10.6%
5+ OAs 38 10.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 19.0% 2015 2016: 38.2% 2016 2017: 54.3% 2017 2018: 64.3% 2018 2019: 73.9% 2019 2020: 63.6% 2020 2021: 65.2% 2021 2022: 77.5% 2022 2025: 28.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014200.0%
201542819.0%
2016341338.2%
2017462554.3%
2018422764.3%
2019231773.9%
2020332163.6%
2021463065.2%
2022403177.5%
202525728.0%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 357 5.0% 17.4% 70.6% 2.5%
Action 2 222 7.7% 7.7% 77.0% 4.1%
Action 3 124 10.5% 4.0% 75.8% 4.8%
Action 4 77 18.2% 6.5% 66.2% 5.2%
Action 5 38 28.9% 2.6% 60.5% 2.6%
Action 6 20 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 7 10 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 14.3% 0.0% 71.4% 14.3%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 7.9% 7 of 89 office actions
All years 9.8% 84 of 859 office actions
Change -1.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
10.0%
5.5%
4.1%
19.8%
24.6%
2019: PEG
11.4%
9.4%
6.5%
6.7%
2025: August memo
12.0%
2.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 17, 2020 15/007,837 Affirmed §101 · §102
Jun. 20, 2019 13/465,555 Affirmed §101
Sep. 27, 2018 14/137,149 Affirmed §101 · §102
Sep. 26, 2018 13/784,456 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §112
Sep. 14, 2018 13/315,665 Affirmed §101 · §103
Apr. 18, 2018 13/247,456 Affirmed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.