Examiner Jalatee Worjloh

Grant ratio: 1.6% (5th percentile in Art Unit 3685 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 7.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 1.6%
Average office actions / grant 7.00
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78162
Primary art unit
3685
Work group
3680
Technology center
3600
Applications
62
Granted applications
1

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 57 34.4% 3.08
Group 285 28.7% 2.80
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 158 office actions across 62 applications
Applications with office actions 90.3% 56 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 9.7%
1 OA 18 29.0%
2 OAs 15 24.2%
3 OAs 7 11.3%
4 OAs 6 9.7%
5+ OAs 10 16.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 11.1% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 0.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009400.0%
2010600.0%
20119111.1%
2012800.0%
2013600.0%
20141200.0%
2015300.0%
2017100.0%
2018400.0%
2020200.0%
2025700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 56 1.8% 8.9% 85.7% 3.6%
Action 2 38 2.6% 10.5% 78.9% 7.9%
Action 3 23 4.3% 17.4% 65.2% 8.7%
Action 4 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 7 office actions
All years 1.9% 3 of 158 office actions
Change -1.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
4.8%
5.6%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 12 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 7, 2020 13/075,054 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jan. 31, 2017 12/905,755 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2015 11/999,351 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 22, 2014 11/477,221 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 18, 2014 11/360,371 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jan. 21, 2014 11/316,236 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 9, 2014 10/431,845 Affirmed §103
May. 30, 2013 11/701,295 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 5, 2013 11/259,218 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §103 · §112
Feb. 19, 2013 10/406,164 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 29, 2012 10/606,507 Affirmed §103
Jun. 7, 2012 11/216,275 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.