Examiner Gregory Mark James

Grant ratio: 12.9% (2nd percentile in Art Unit 3692 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.39. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 12.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.39
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
94585
Primary art unit
3692
Work group
3690
Technology center
3600
Applications
178
Granted applications
23
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5155
Supervisor
Calvin Hewitt
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6709

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 30.7% 2.88
Group 163 34.3% 2.69
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.08 548 office actions across 178 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 177 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.6%
1 OA 43 24.2%
2 OAs 36 20.2%
3 OAs 36 20.2%
4 OAs 29 16.3%
5+ OAs 33 18.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019: 16.7% 2019 2020: 35.0% 2020 2021: 21.1% 2021 2022: 25.0% 2022 2023: 12.5% 2023 2024: 10.5% 2024 2025: 3.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20196116.7%
202020735.0%
202119421.1%
202220525.0%
202324312.5%
202419210.5%
20252713.7%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 177 6.8% 2.8% 81.9% 0.6%
Action 2 134 29.1% 1.5% 63.4% 1.5%
Action 3 98 55.1% 0.0% 41.8% 2.0%
Action 4 62 66.1% 0.0% 25.8% 6.5%
Action 5 33 72.7% 0.0% 12.1% 12.1%
Action 6 23 87.0% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3%
Action 7 10 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 71.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 50.0% 122 of 244 office actions
All years 37.8% 207 of 548 office actions
Change +12.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2019: PEG
4.8%
21.2%
36.4%
38.7%
34.1%
2024: AI examples
50.6%
2025: August memo
58.1%
43.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.9 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 24, 2026 16/897,219 Affirmed §101
Jan. 16, 2026 17/520,117 Affirmed §101
Nov. 19, 2025 17/490,081 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §112
Oct. 27, 2025 18/527,962 Affirmed §101
Oct. 27, 2025 16/446,469 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 26, 2025 18/102,748 Rehearing Decision Granted-in-Part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
Feb. 29, 2024 16/248,287 Affirmed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.