Examiner B. Joan Amelunxen

Grant ratio: 32.3% (57th percentile in Art Unit 3693 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.83. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2017
Grant ratio 32.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.83
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84921
Primary art unit
3693
Work group
3690
Technology center
3600
Applications
248
Granted applications
80

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 31.0% 2.44
Group 163 34.3% 2.69
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.05 877 office actions across 288 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 288 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 82 28.5%
2 OAs 63 21.9%
3 OAs 39 13.5%
4 OAs 48 16.7%
5+ OAs 56 19.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 12.5% 2008 2009: 65.7% 2009 2010: 45.8% 2010 2011: 37.5% 2011 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 30.8% 2014 2015: 12.9% 2015 2016: 20.0% 2016 2017: 11.8% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200816212.5%
2009352365.7%
2010241145.8%
201116637.5%
201221733.3%
2013201050.0%
201426830.8%
201531412.9%
201625520.0%
201734411.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 288 16.3% 15.6% 62.8% 2.4%
Action 2 206 24.8% 14.1% 56.3% 2.9%
Action 3 143 28.0% 9.1% 58.7% 2.1%
Action 4 104 31.7% 7.7% 58.7% 1.0%
Action 5 56 39.3% 1.8% 55.4% 1.8%
Action 6 35 42.9% 5.7% 48.6% 2.9%
Action 7 19 47.4% 0.0% 52.6% 0.0%
Action 8 11 72.7% 0.0% 27.3% 0.0%
Action 9 9 77.8% 0.0% 22.2% 0.0%
Action 10 5 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 26.8% 235 of 877 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2.5%
21.4%
13.8%
2014: Alice
28.9%
33.3%
42.6%
96.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 28. Merits outcomes: 19 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 7/28 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
32.1% 9/28 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 2, 2020 12/180,129 Affirmed §101
Mar. 20, 2020 13/555,837 Affirmed §101
Mar. 13, 2020 12/985,894 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §112
Mar. 2, 2020 13/617,438 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §103 · §112
Feb. 4, 2020 13/185,929 Affirmed §101
Jan. 13, 2020 13/316,754 Affirmed §101
Aug. 2, 2019 13/110,476 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 26, 2019 13/153,298 Affirmed §101
Nov. 29, 2018 14/355,471 Affirmed §101 · §103
Nov. 28, 2018 12/322,826 Affirmed §101
Nov. 28, 2018 13/359,035 Reversed §101
Nov. 9, 2018 12/129,217 Affirmed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.