Examiner Harish T. Dass

Grant ratio: 46.8% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 3695 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.50. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2016
Grant ratio 46.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.50
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79274
Primary art unit
3695
Work group
3690
Technology center
3600
Applications
263
Granted applications
123

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 30.3% 2.96
Group 163 34.3% 2.69
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.74 720 office actions across 263 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 263 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 79 30.0%
2 OAs 73 27.8%
3 OAs 33 12.5%
4 OAs 43 16.3%
5+ OAs 35 13.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 37.5% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 51.7% 2010 2011: 65.7% 2011 2012: 72.2% 2012 2013: 62.5% 2013 2014: 11.1% 2014 2015: 7.7% 2015 2016: 18.2% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200816637.5%
2009402460.0%
2010291551.7%
2011352365.7%
2012362672.2%
2013322062.5%
201427311.1%
20152627.7%
201622418.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 263 4.6% 3.8% 87.8% 2.7%
Action 2 184 7.6% 1.6% 87.5% 1.6%
Action 3 111 11.7% 0.9% 85.6% 1.8%
Action 4 78 17.9% 0.0% 78.2% 2.6%
Action 5 35 17.1% 2.9% 77.1% 2.9%
Action 6 25 12.0% 0.0% 88.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 15.4% 7.7% 76.9% 0.0%
Action 8 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 9.0% 65 of 720 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
9.3%
3.2%
2.1%
2.1%
4.7%
2014: Alice
10.8%
41.7%
37.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 14. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
15.4% 2/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
38.5% 5/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.4 months
New grounds of rejection
4
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 25, 2016 10/707,491 Affirmed §101 · §103
Feb. 25, 2016 12/042,176 Affirmed §103
Jun. 29, 2015 12/194,628 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 8, 2014 11/782,381 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Oct. 7, 2013 10/054,689 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Jun. 11, 2013 11/744,083 Reversed §103
May. 2, 2013 09/970,600 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112
Oct. 18, 2012 11/974,987 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 28, 2012 11/735,769 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jun. 8, 2012 11/627,138 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 13, 2012 09/907,450 Reversed §103
Mar. 12, 2012 11/755,806 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.