AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jinney Kil

Examiner Jinney Kil appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 31.7%, they average 2.25 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.25
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3191
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3640 - Aeronautics, Agriculture, Weaponry, Nuclear Systems, Licensing and Review

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
227
Granted Applications
72
Non-Granted Applications
155
Avg OA / Grant
2.25
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3646
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 31.7% 2.25
Art Unit 28 60.6% 1.86
Group 269 56.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 5 3 60.0%
2021 45 24 53.3%
2022 26 15 57.7%
2023 37 13 35.1%
2024 37 13 35.1%
2025 48 4 8.3%
2026 29 0 0.0%

72 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 220 0.5% 12.7% 75.5% 6.4%
2 159 3.1% 7.5% 79.2% 6.9%
3 96 2.1% 4.2% 85.4% 7.3%
4 60 0.0% 3.3% 93.3% 3.3%
5 34 5.9% 2.9% 91.2% 0.0%
6 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 0.0%
7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.6%
2023
1.5%
2024
3.0%
2025
13.8%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.