AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Danielle M Jackson

Examiner Danielle M Jackson appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 66.7%, they average 1.81 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.81
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
6 years (2021-2026)
Phone
(303) 297-4364
Predicted Supervisor
Abby Lin
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3976
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
153
Granted Applications
102
Non-Granted Applications
51
Avg OA / Grant
1.81
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3657 , 3664
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 66.7% 1.81
Art Unit 74 61.1% 1.72
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2021; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2021 21 16 76.2%
2022 37 29 78.4%
2023 28 20 71.4%
2024 26 22 84.6%
2025 31 15 48.4%
2026 10 0 0.0%

102 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 152 3.3% 2.6% 84.2% 2.0%
2 72 2.8% 0.0% 86.1% 4.2%
3 35 0.0% 2.9% 91.4% 5.7%
4 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 5.9%
5 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
50.0%
2020
5.7%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
2.4%
2024
2.1%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.