AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Janice Loza

Examiner Janice Loza appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 0.0% and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant N/A
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
2 years (2025-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3979
Predicted Supervisor
Patrick Mcatee
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7575
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3690 - Business Methods - Finance/Banking/ Insurance and Business Cryptography

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
46
Granted Applications
0
Non-Granted Applications
46
Avg OA / Grant
N/A
Last OA Observed
July 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3698
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 0.0% N/A
Art Unit 8 24.1% 2.24
Group 163 34.5% 2.69
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2025; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2025 13 0 0.0%
2026 33 0 0.0%

0 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 46 0.0% 6.5% 89.1% 0.0%
2 31 41.9% 3.2% 51.6% 0.0%
3 16 37.5% 6.3% 56.3% 0.0%
4 10 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
5 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2024
21.7%
2025
30.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.