Examiner Ross Williams

Grant ratio: 55.7% (47th percentile in Art Unit 3714 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.74. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.74
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80967
Primary art unit
3714
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
734
Granted applications
409
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5911
Supervisor
Kang Hu
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1344

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 35.5% 1.89
Group 174 38.5% 2.15
Tech Center 2,685 47.8% 2.01
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.60 1,907 office actions across 734 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 731 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 250 34.1%
2 OAs 191 26.0%
3 OAs 105 14.3%
4 OAs 79 10.8%
5+ OAs 106 14.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 40.9% 2008 2009: 40.0% 2009 2010: 51.3% 2010 2011: 31.3% 2011 2012: 67.9% 2012 2013: 51.4% 2013 2014: 60.0% 2014 2015: 70.4% 2015 2016: 73.1% 2016 2017: 64.3% 2017 2018: 61.9% 2018 2019: 67.4% 2019 2020: 69.2% 2020 2021: 72.0% 2021 2022: 77.5% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 21.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200822940.9%
2009251040.0%
2010392051.3%
2011321031.3%
2012281967.9%
2013371951.4%
2014452760.0%
2015543870.4%
2016523873.1%
2017281864.3%
2018422661.9%
2019432967.4%
2020523669.2%
2021251872.0%
2022403177.5%
2023453680.0%
2024302066.7%
202523521.7%
20267200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 731 6.3% 21.8% 62.4% 1.9%
Action 2 481 17.9% 10.0% 61.7% 5.2%
Action 3 290 23.1% 6.9% 59.7% 3.4%
Action 4 185 32.4% 4.9% 51.9% 5.4%
Action 5 106 46.2% 3.8% 42.5% 1.9%
Action 6 62 46.8% 6.5% 41.9% 0.0%
Action 7 26 38.5% 15.4% 38.5% 0.0%
Action 8 14 42.9% 7.1% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 26.9% 79 of 294 office actions
All years 18.9% 361 of 1,907 office actions
Change +7.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.9%
4.8%
4.9%
3.9%
9.5%
2014: Alice
28.3%
52.4%
43.8%
19.0%
23.0%
2019: PEG
24.1%
19.5%
5.0%
7.4%
18.6%
2024: AI examples
10.7%
2025: August memo
20.2%
44.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 1, 2019 14/805,863 Affirmed §101
Jun. 13, 2018 11/968,390 Affirmed §101 · §102
Mar. 26, 2018 13/037,489 Affirmed §101

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.