AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David L Lewis

Examiner David L Lewis appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 62.7%, they average 1.17 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.17
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-7673
Predicted Supervisor
Eugene Kim
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4463
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2620 - Selective Visual Display Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
150
Granted Applications
94
Non-Granted Applications
56
Avg OA / Grant
1.17
Last OA Observed
May 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2629 , 3714 , 3715
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 62.7% 1.17
Art Unit 43 42.7% 2.03
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,747 58.1% 1.88
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 49 43 87.8%
2009 49 39 79.6%
2010 10 10 100.0%
2011 14 0 0.0%
2012 4 0 0.0%
2013 1 0 0.0%
2014 1 0 0.0%
2015 4 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2016.
2017 2 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2018-2024.
2025 13 2 15.4%
2026 3 0 0.0%

94 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 148 0.0% 45.3% 48.0% 3.4%
2 29 0.0% 31.0% 69.0% 0.0%
3 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
4 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
5 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2025
33.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.