Examiner Kang Hu

Grant ratio: 37.6% (51st percentile in Art Unit 3715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 37.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.76
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82644
Primary art unit
3715
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
266
Granted applications
100
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1344

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 79 33.7% 2.29
Group 173 39.0% 2.15
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 573 office actions across 266 applications
Applications with office actions 97.4% 259 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 2.6%
1 OA 117 44.0%
2 OAs 66 24.8%
3 OAs 26 9.8%
4 OAs 27 10.2%
5+ OAs 23 8.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 13.6% 2008 2009: 23.1% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 70.0% 2011 2012: 63.6% 2012 2013: 17.9% 2013 2014: 6.7% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2018: 0.0% 2018 2020: 55.6% 2020 2023: 100.0% 2023 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
200822313.6%
200939923.1%
2010542750.0%
2011402870.0%
2012221463.6%
201339717.9%
20141516.7%
2015700.0%
2016100.0%
2018100.0%
20209555.6%
202366100.0%
2025400.0%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 259 3.1% 13.9% 79.5% 0.4%
Action 2 142 3.5% 8.5% 84.5% 2.8%
Action 3 76 3.9% 6.6% 84.2% 5.3%
Action 4 50 2.0% 4.0% 86.0% 8.0%
Action 5 23 0.0% 0.0% 82.6% 8.7%
Action 6 11 9.1% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 7 8 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 30.0% 3 of 10 office actions
All years 3.3% 19 of 573 office actions
Change +26.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
1.9%
5.6%
3.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
50.0%
16.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 18. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 4/18 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 8/18 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 2, 2019 11/953,324 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2016 11/830,827 Affirmed §103
May. 26, 2016 13/295,829 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 18, 2016 12/626,339 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 12, 2016 12/063,815 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 21, 2016 12/022,340 Reversed N/A
Feb. 23, 2016 12/230,934 Reversed §103
Nov. 14, 2013 11/245,853 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 30, 2013 10/893,662 Affirmed §103
Jun. 21, 2013 11/440,197 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 13, 2012 10/730,095 Affirmed §101 · §102
May. 24, 2012 10/672,851 Affirmed in part §101 · §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.