Examiner Eric M. Thomas

Grant ratio: 62.7% (89th percentile in Art Unit 3715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83335
Primary art unit
3715
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
823
Granted applications
516
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1699
Supervisor
David Lewis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7673

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 79 33.7% 2.29
Group 173 39.0% 2.15
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 1,999 office actions across 823 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 822 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 350 42.5%
2 OAs 178 21.6%
3 OAs 103 12.5%
4 OAs 98 11.9%
5+ OAs 93 11.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 9.1% 2008 2009: 23.1% 2009 2010: 52.2% 2010 2011: 55.8% 2011 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 60.9% 2013 2014: 31.6% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 69.6% 2016 2017: 63.6% 2017 2018: 82.2% 2018 2019: 80.9% 2019 2020: 77.4% 2020 2021: 81.6% 2021 2022: 92.5% 2022 2023: 94.1% 2023 2024: 88.2% 2024 2025: 64.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081119.1%
200926623.1%
2010673552.2%
2011432455.8%
2012452760.0%
2013231460.9%
201419631.6%
2015301240.0%
2016463269.6%
2017332163.6%
2018453782.2%
2019473880.9%
2020534177.4%
2021494081.6%
2022534992.5%
2023514894.1%
2024766788.2%
2025281864.3%
20267800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 822 12.8% 41.8% 31.3% 0.4%
Action 2 472 14.2% 23.1% 60.4% 0.0%
Action 3 294 13.6% 9.9% 76.5% 0.0%
Action 4 191 13.1% 7.3% 78.5% 0.0%
Action 5 93 14.0% 7.5% 78.5% 0.0%
Action 6 55 29.1% 3.6% 65.5% 1.8%
Action 7 29 24.1% 6.9% 69.0% 0.0%
Action 8 20 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 11 36.4% 0.0% 63.6% 0.0%
Action 10 4 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 24.9% 78 of 313 office actions
All years 14.2% 284 of 1,999 office actions
Change +10.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
10.8%
11.1%
2014: Alice
1.6%
27.3%
35.2%
24.7%
19.0%
2019: PEG
4.0%
22.1%
17.3%
19.8%
17.3%
2024: AI examples
12.2%
2025: August memo
18.7%
42.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 24, 2020 14/318,353 Reversed §103
Apr. 2, 2019 14/311,917 Affirmed §101
Jun. 30, 2014 10/726,979 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 29, 2013 11/581,007 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.