Examiner Allen Chan

Grant ratio: 64.2% (90th percentile in Art Unit 3715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.91. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.91
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85219
Primary art unit
3715
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
716
Granted applications
460
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5529
Supervisor
Dmitry Suhol
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4430

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 79 33.7% 2.29
Group 173 39.0% 2.15
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 1,321 office actions across 718 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 718 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 417 58.1%
2 OAs 160 22.3%
3 OAs 56 7.8%
4 OAs 42 5.8%
5+ OAs 43 6.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 9.5% 2009 2010: 55.2% 2010 2011: 36.1% 2011 2012: 58.1% 2012 2013: 78.7% 2013 2014: 70.7% 2014 2015: 89.6% 2015 2016: 69.8% 2016 2017: 76.2% 2017 2018: 70.0% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 78.4% 2020 2021: 72.5% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 84.6% 2023 2024: 82.9% 2024 2025: 39.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081800.0%
20092129.5%
2010291655.2%
2011361336.1%
2012311858.1%
2013473778.7%
2014412970.7%
2015484389.6%
2016433069.8%
2017423276.2%
2018402870.0%
2019453680.0%
2020372978.4%
2021513772.5%
2022353188.6%
2023393384.6%
2024352982.9%
2025431739.5%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 718 15.9% 17.7% 54.3% 3.9%
Action 2 301 12.6% 10.0% 71.4% 2.0%
Action 3 141 12.1% 2.8% 83.0% 2.1%
Action 4 85 9.4% 4.7% 84.7% 0.0%
Action 5 43 14.0% 2.3% 83.7% 0.0%
Action 6 17 11.8% 5.9% 82.4% 0.0%
Action 7 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 23.5% 35 of 149 office actions
All years 14.2% 187 of 1,321 office actions
Change +9.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
1.1%
3.6%
2014: Alice
27.8%
37.6%
34.2%
30.5%
10.8%
2019: PEG
11.4%
3.2%
3.3%
21.3%
34.6%
2024: AI examples
36.8%
2025: August memo
19.6%
9.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2017 13/481,802 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 30, 2016 12/589,681 Affirmed §103
Dec. 31, 2015 11/557,869 Affirmed §101 · §103
Oct. 30, 2013 11/368,695 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 8, 2013 11/413,478 Reversed N/A
Jun. 3, 2010 11/413,478 Remanded §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.