Examiner Steve Rowland

Grant ratio: 72.8% (96th percentile in Art Unit 3715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.85. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.85
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86136
Primary art unit
3715
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,101
Granted applications
801
Examiner phone
(469) 295-9129
Supervisor
Dmitry Suhol
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4430

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 79 33.7% 2.29
Group 173 39.0% 2.15
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,996 office actions across 1,101 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,096 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.5%
1 OA 605 55.0%
2 OAs 279 25.3%
3 OAs 105 9.5%
4 OAs 59 5.4%
5+ OAs 48 4.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 14.8% 2009 2010: 24.1% 2010 2011: 48.9% 2011 2012: 54.2% 2012 2013: 62.7% 2013 2014: 72.7% 2014 2015: 77.9% 2015 2016: 86.5% 2016 2017: 87.5% 2017 2018: 86.4% 2018 2019: 81.9% 2019 2020: 87.8% 2020 2021: 90.4% 2021 2022: 88.1% 2022 2023: 95.9% 2023 2024: 90.5% 2024 2025: 53.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
200927414.8%
201029724.1%
2011452248.9%
2012482654.2%
2013513262.7%
2014775672.7%
2015685377.9%
2016746486.5%
2017726387.5%
2018665786.4%
2019725981.9%
2020746587.8%
2021736690.4%
2022675988.1%
2023747195.9%
2024635790.5%
2025754053.3%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,096 11.0% 19.9% 48.9% 8.4%
Action 2 491 14.5% 12.2% 56.0% 10.2%
Action 3 212 14.2% 12.7% 60.8% 10.4%
Action 4 107 16.8% 6.5% 64.5% 9.3%
Action 5 48 14.6% 6.3% 66.7% 10.4%
Action 6 21 9.5% 9.5% 66.7% 9.5%
Action 7 11 9.1% 9.1% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 19.5% 53 of 272 office actions
All years 12.5% 250 of 1,996 office actions
Change +7.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

10.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.8%
6.8%
8.8%
2014: Alice
17.5%
26.6%
30.0%
16.2%
8.4%
2019: PEG
8.9%
4.5%
8.3%
12.5%
18.2%
2024: AI examples
25.0%
2025: August memo
12.4%
21.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
43.8% 7/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 12/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2019 11/698,515 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
Jul. 25, 2018 13/772,566 Affirmed §101 · §112
Mar. 16, 2018 13/910,992 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 18, 2017 11/984,443 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 14, 2016 12/868,889 Reversed §102
Nov. 25, 2015 12/866,186 Reversed N/A
Nov. 17, 2015 12/272,646 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 13, 2015 11/553,130 Reversed N/A
Jul. 29, 2015 11/186,798 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Jun. 22, 2015 12/607,579 Reversed N/A
Jun. 11, 2015 12/233,040 Reversed N/A
Apr. 16, 2015 13/244,818 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.