Examiner Lawrence Galka

Grant ratio: 70.0% (90th percentile in Art Unit 3715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.96. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 70.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.96
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86571
Primary art unit
3715
Work group
3710
Technology center
3700
Applications
901
Granted applications
631
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1386
Supervisor
David Lewis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7673

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 82 33.7% 2.28
Group 174 38.6% 2.15
Tech Center 2,679 48.0% 2.01
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,664 office actions across 901 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 895 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.7%
1 OA 511 56.7%
2 OAs 205 22.8%
3 OAs 81 9.0%
4 OAs 43 4.8%
5+ OAs 55 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 27.6% 2009 2010: 27.3% 2010 2011: 33.3% 2011 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 70.2% 2013 2014: 70.2% 2014 2015: 81.3% 2015 2016: 72.7% 2016 2017: 79.0% 2017 2018: 76.5% 2018 2019: 80.3% 2019 2020: 90.4% 2020 2021: 89.5% 2021 2022: 94.3% 2022 2023: 93.2% 2023 2024: 90.5% 2024 2025: 59.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200929827.6%
201033927.3%
2011301033.3%
2012402460.0%
2013574070.2%
2014473370.2%
2015483981.3%
2016554072.7%
2017624979.0%
2018513976.5%
2019614980.3%
2020524790.4%
2021575189.5%
2022535094.3%
2023595593.2%
2024635790.5%
2025523159.6%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 895 2.7% 22.9% 64.4% 3.6%
Action 2 384 6.5% 16.4% 65.6% 6.5%
Action 3 179 5.0% 9.5% 76.0% 5.6%
Action 4 98 3.1% 8.2% 79.6% 6.1%
Action 5 55 5.5% 7.3% 78.2% 7.3%
Action 6 27 7.4% 7.4% 77.8% 7.4%
Action 7 17 5.9% 11.8% 76.5% 5.9%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.2% 10 of 240 office actions
All years 4.0% 67 of 1,664 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
3.5%
4.6%
1.4%
2014: Alice
10.2%
4.7%
11.3%
3.3%
5.3%
2019: PEG
4.4%
3.5%
2.4%
1.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.4%
2025: August memo
2.9%
9.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 27, 2023 16/735,290 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Aug. 12, 2016 11/429,249 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 15, 2016 12/199,363 Affirmed N/A
May. 11, 2015 12/313,297 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 30, 2014 11/790,349 Reversed §103
Jan. 14, 2014 11/149,828 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 28, 2013 11/331,611 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.