Examiner Chelsea Stinson

Grant ratio: 72.8% (86th percentile in Art Unit 3731 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 72.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91154
Primary art unit
3731
Work group
3730
Technology center
3700
Applications
449
Granted applications
327
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1744
Supervisor
Alford Kindred
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4037

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 51 60.9% 2.23
Group 289 50.3% 2.22
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.35 1,086 office actions across 463 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 463 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 184 39.7%
2 OAs 121 26.1%
3 OAs 68 14.7%
4 OAs 42 9.1%
5+ OAs 48 10.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 14.3% 2014 2015: 51.6% 2015 2016: 57.8% 2016 2017: 47.2% 2017 2018: 75.5% 2018 2019: 78.4% 2019 2020: 83.9% 2020 2021: 89.4% 2021 2022: 84.6% 2022 2023: 84.4% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201414214.3%
2015311651.6%
2016452657.8%
2017361747.2%
2018534075.5%
2019745878.4%
2020564783.9%
2021665989.4%
2022393384.6%
2023322784.4%
202422100.0%
2026100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 463 0.0% 12.1% 75.2% 11.0%
Action 2 279 0.0% 27.2% 68.8% 3.2%
Action 3 158 0.0% 19.0% 77.2% 1.3%
Action 4 90 0.0% 13.3% 84.4% 2.2%
Action 5 48 0.0% 8.3% 89.6% 0.0%
Action 6 28 0.0% 10.7% 85.7% 3.6%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 7.1%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 38 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,086 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
53.8% 7/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
61.5% 8/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 9, 2022 15/444,252 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 12, 2021 14/873,359 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2021 15/566,269 Reversed §103
Dec. 10, 2020 14/967,421 Affirmed §103
Nov. 12, 2020 14/704,067 Reversed §103
Sep. 18, 2020 15/000,066 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Aug. 4, 2020 13/584,931 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 29, 2019 14/376,159 Reversed §103
Jul. 17, 2019 14/070,519 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 9, 2018 13/328,192 Reversed §103
Sep. 21, 2018 13/703,857 Affirmed §102 · §112
Apr. 30, 2018 13/466,601 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.