AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Brigid K Byrd

Examiner Brigid K Byrd appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 58.2%, they average 2.09 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.09
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-7698
Predicted Supervisor
Darwin Erezo
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4695
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3770 - Medical and Surgical Instruments, Treatment Devices, and Supplies

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
349
Granted Applications
203
Non-Granted Applications
146
Avg OA / Grant
2.09
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3731 , 3771
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 58.2% 2.09
Art Unit 73 54.9% 1.95
Group 269 49.9% 2.08
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 18 11 61.1%
2019 41 26 63.4%
2020 41 32 78.0%
2021 37 27 73.0%
2022 28 19 67.9%
2023 50 37 74.0%
2024 46 37 80.4%
2025 64 14 21.9%
2026 24 0 0.0%

203 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 346 0.6% 9.8% 66.5% 10.1%
2 182 0.0% 5.5% 79.1% 9.3%
3 90 0.0% 2.2% 81.1% 7.8%
4 49 0.0% 4.1% 81.6% 6.1%
5 22 0.0% 0.0% 77.3% 13.6%
6 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.