Examiner Kareen Rush

Grant ratio: 73.1% (95th percentile in Art Unit 3736 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.50. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.50
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86401
Primary art unit
3736
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,367
Granted applications
999
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5611
Supervisor
Orlando E. Aviles
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5531

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 51.5% 2.19
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.50 2,047 office actions across 1,367 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,362 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.4%
1 OA 925 67.7%
2 OAs 289 21.1%
3 OAs 87 6.4%
4 OAs 39 2.9%
5+ OAs 22 1.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 6.3% 2009 2010: 37.0% 2010 2011: 54.2% 2011 2012: 67.8% 2012 2013: 67.2% 2013 2014: 82.2% 2014 2015: 83.1% 2015 2016: 81.1% 2016 2017: 81.7% 2017 2018: 90.9% 2018 2019: 90.1% 2019 2020: 81.1% 2020 2021: 82.1% 2021 2022: 92.0% 2022 2023: 83.1% 2023 2024: 93.3% 2024 2025: 56.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20094836.3%
2010732737.0%
2011593254.2%
2012594067.8%
2013614167.2%
2014907482.2%
2015715983.1%
2016746081.1%
2017826781.7%
201811010090.9%
201911110090.1%
2020907381.1%
2021675582.1%
2022888192.0%
2023776483.1%
2024898393.3%
2025714056.3%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,362 0.8% 26.1% 46.6% 13.1%
Action 2 437 0.5% 18.3% 68.6% 5.3%
Action 3 148 0.0% 16.9% 75.7% 4.7%
Action 4 61 0.0% 3.3% 85.2% 8.2%
Action 5 22 0.0% 13.6% 86.4% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 289 office actions
All years 0.6% 13 of 2,047 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.7%
2019: PEG
2.0%
3.6%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 8, 2020 15/470,680 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 17, 2019 14/654,297 Reversed §103
Jun. 29, 2016 12/112,077 Affirmed §103
Sep. 17, 2015 12/555,826 Reversed N/A
Sep. 18, 2013 11/424,969 Reversed §103
Nov. 30, 2012 11/427,813 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.