Examiner Cheryl Miller

Grant ratio: 54.4% (10th percentile in Art Unit 3738 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2017
Grant ratio 54.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.37
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79037
Primary art unit
3738
Work group
3730
Technology center
3700
Applications
294
Granted applications
160

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 60.6% 2.28
Group 289 50.3% 2.22
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.02 892 office actions across 295 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 295 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 74 25.1%
2 OAs 71 24.1%
3 OAs 46 15.6%
4 OAs 41 13.9%
5+ OAs 63 21.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.6% 2008 2009: 58.1% 2009 2010: 47.8% 2010 2011: 60.7% 2011 2012: 58.1% 2012 2013: 48.0% 2013 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 73.5% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008431432.6%
2009432558.1%
2010231147.8%
2011281760.7%
2012311858.1%
2013251248.0%
2014341750.0%
2015301860.0%
2016342573.5%
201733100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 295 0.0% 25.4% 64.4% 5.1%
Action 2 221 0.0% 19.0% 67.9% 5.9%
Action 3 150 0.0% 16.0% 65.3% 8.7%
Action 4 104 0.0% 8.7% 74.0% 8.7%
Action 5 63 0.0% 15.9% 55.6% 17.5%
Action 6 34 0.0% 11.8% 47.1% 17.6%
Action 7 13 0.0% 7.7% 61.5% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 16.7%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 892 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.8 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2016 12/706,904 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 11, 2016 12/849,470 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 11, 2013 11/461,509 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 26, 2013 10/777,514 Reversed N/A
Jan. 17, 2013 11/327,795 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 31, 2012 11/121,408 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §120
Jul. 20, 2012 09/783,633 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 14, 2012 11/430,334 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 22, 2012 10/858,589 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.