Examiner Orlando E. Aviles Bosques

Grant ratio: 47.3% (55th percentile in Art Unit 3744 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 47.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.48
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87670
Primary art unit
3744
Work group
3740
Technology center
3700
Applications
334
Granted applications
158
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5531
Supervisor
Clinton Ostrup
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5559

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 59 35.6% 2.12
Group 443 57.4% 1.86
Tech Center 2,685 47.8% 2.01
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.60 893 office actions across 343 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 343 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 100 29.2%
2 OAs 122 35.6%
3 OAs 44 12.8%
4 OAs 40 11.7%
5+ OAs 37 10.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 26.7% 2011 2012: 23.8% 2012 2013: 34.2% 2013 2014: 43.6% 2014 2015: 42.1% 2015 2016: 71.4% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 63.9% 2018 2019: 70.6% 2019 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 22.2% 2022 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201115426.7%
2012421023.8%
2013381334.2%
2014391743.6%
2015381642.1%
2016493571.4%
2017392666.7%
2018362363.9%
2019171270.6%
2021600.0%
20229222.2%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 343 0.6% 5.5% 81.3% 10.2%
Action 2 243 0.4% 8.6% 71.2% 18.5%
Action 3 121 0.0% 5.0% 81.8% 12.4%
Action 4 77 0.0% 9.1% 85.7% 5.2%
Action 5 37 0.0% 5.4% 78.4% 16.2%
Action 6 27 0.0% 3.7% 88.9% 7.4%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
Action 8 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 7 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 893 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
36.4% 4/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 10, 2020 14/801,221 Affirmed §103
May. 15, 2020 12/303,956 Affirmed §112
May. 8, 2019 13/050,716 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 17, 2018 12/446,548 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 12, 2018 12/375,255 Affirmed §103
Jan. 25, 2018 12/970,856 Affirmed §103
Jul. 14, 2017 12/290,434 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 9, 2017 12/757,944 Reversed §103
Jan. 31, 2017 12/754,938 Reversed §103
Jan. 24, 2017 12/577,148 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 27, 2015 13/058,878 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.