Examiner Erin Mcgrath

Grant ratio: 48.8% (58th percentile in Art Unit 3761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.65
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92497
Primary art unit
3761
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
516
Granted applications
252
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0674
Supervisor
Jackie Ho
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4696

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 36.6% 2.17
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 1,302 office actions across 542 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 542 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 193 35.6%
2 OAs 163 30.1%
3 OAs 74 13.7%
4 OAs 63 11.6%
5+ OAs 49 9.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 22.2% 2015 2016: 35.1% 2016 2017: 31.4% 2017 2018: 35.7% 2018 2019: 54.3% 2019 2020: 70.7% 2020 2021: 84.1% 2021 2022: 54.3% 2022 2023: 62.3% 2023 2024: 63.6% 2024 2025: 41.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20159222.2%
2016371335.1%
2017351131.4%
2018421535.7%
2019462554.3%
2020825870.7%
2021443784.1%
2022351954.3%
2023533362.3%
2024221463.6%
2025612541.0%
20265000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 542 0.2% 2.2% 92.8% 4.2%
Action 2 349 0.0% 2.9% 92.3% 4.3%
Action 3 186 0.0% 1.1% 94.1% 5.4%
Action 4 112 0.0% 0.0% 97.3% 2.7%
Action 5 49 2.0% 0.0% 98.0% 0.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 88.5% 11.5%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 275 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,302 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 4, 2021 15/236,672 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 19, 2020 14/208,399 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 7, 2020 15/222,311 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 1, 2020 14/565,670 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 27, 2018 14/475,061 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 25, 2018 14/375,666 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.