Examiner Anna Kinsaul

Grant ratio: 39.0% (28th percentile in Art Unit 3765 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 39.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87491
Primary art unit
3765
Work group
3760
Technology center
3700
Applications
454
Granted applications
177
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1926
Supervisor
Edward Lefkowitz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2180

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 47.5% 1.96
Group 384 48.9% 2.11
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.94 881 office actions across 454 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 450 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.9%
1 OA 205 45.2%
2 OAs 148 32.6%
3 OAs 50 11.0%
4 OAs 28 6.2%
5+ OAs 19 4.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 16.7% 2011 2012: 34.5% 2012 2013: 38.6% 2013 2014: 54.0% 2014 2015: 39.4% 2015 2016: 44.1% 2016 2017: 51.6% 2017 2018: 42.4% 2018 2019: 58.8% 2019 2020: 37.5% 2020 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201148816.7%
2012551934.5%
2013572238.6%
2014633454.0%
2015662639.4%
2016341544.1%
2017311651.6%
2018331442.4%
2019342058.8%
20208337.5%
20251000.0%
20261500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 450 0.7% 4.4% 81.1% 0.2%
Action 2 245 0.4% 4.1% 85.7% 2.0%
Action 3 97 0.0% 3.1% 86.6% 4.1%
Action 4 47 0.0% 2.1% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 5 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 33 office actions
All years 0.7% 6 of 881 office actions
Change -0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
4.2%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 23, 2018 13/894,078 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 29, 2017 13/363,104 Reversed §103
Aug. 9, 2017 13/234,624 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 19, 2016 13/595,528 Affirmed §103
Mar. 24, 2015 12/592,333 Reversed N/A
Oct. 2, 2014 12/367,853 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.