Examiner Clinton Ostrup

Grant ratio: 45.3% (25th percentile in Art Unit 3771 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 45.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78537
Primary art unit
3771
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
408
Granted applications
185

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 72 53.8% 1.94
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 755 office actions across 408 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 403 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.2%
1 OA 199 48.8%
2 OAs 117 28.7%
3 OAs 43 10.5%
4 OAs 32 7.8%
5+ OAs 12 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 57.1% 2008 2009: 55.2% 2009 2010: 63.6% 2010 2011: 61.1% 2011 2012: 74.1% 2012 2013: 18.2% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2020: 100.0% 2020 2025: 14.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008492857.1%
2009583255.2%
2010664263.6%
2011543361.1%
2012544074.1%
201333618.2%
20141300.0%
2015900.0%
20163400.0%
20171500.0%
20182150.0%
202011100.0%
202514214.3%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 403 0.5% 6.5% 83.4% 4.0%
Action 2 204 0.0% 6.9% 88.7% 2.0%
Action 3 87 0.0% 10.3% 83.9% 1.1%
Action 4 44 2.3% 9.1% 84.1% 2.3%
Action 5 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 24 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 755 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
56.3% 9/16 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
56.3% 9/16 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 13, 2016 12/934,069 Reversed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 11/950,871 Affirmed §103
Apr. 4, 2016 11/972,577 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2014 12/807,523 Affirmed §103
Apr. 25, 2014 11/418,616 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 20, 2014 11/251,928 Reversed N/A
Sep. 25, 2013 11/877,068 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 16, 2013 11/939,202 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 26, 2013 11/070,621 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 14, 2013 10/533,928 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 12, 2013 10/864,869 Reversed N/A
Feb. 26, 2013 11/731,538 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.