Examiner Brian Dukert

Grant ratio: 75.2% (89th percentile in Art Unit 3774 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87218
Primary art unit
3774
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
821
Granted applications
617
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3258
Supervisor
Melanie Tyson
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9062

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 58 43.9% 1.95
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.75 1,435 office actions across 821 applications
Applications with office actions 97.1% 797 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 24 2.9%
1 OA 399 48.6%
2 OAs 260 31.7%
3 OAs 75 9.1%
4 OAs 42 5.1%
5+ OAs 21 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 64.1% 2011 2012: 51.6% 2012 2013: 70.6% 2013 2014: 78.3% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 82.9% 2016 2017: 81.0% 2017 2018: 91.3% 2018 2019: 92.0% 2019 2020: 92.7% 2020 2021: 81.2% 2021 2022: 88.0% 2022 2023: 86.0% 2023 2024: 84.0% 2024 2025: 47.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
2011392564.1%
2012311651.6%
2013513670.6%
2014463678.3%
2015564478.6%
2016705882.9%
2017635181.0%
2018696391.3%
2019504692.0%
2020413892.7%
2021695681.2%
2022504488.0%
2023433786.0%
2024504284.0%
2025512447.1%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 797 0.6% 30.9% 58.7% 5.9%
Action 2 398 0.0% 23.6% 63.1% 6.5%
Action 3 138 0.0% 20.3% 69.6% 5.1%
Action 4 63 0.0% 20.6% 71.4% 4.8%
Action 5 21 0.0% 14.3% 71.4% 9.5%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 215 office actions
All years 0.3% 5 of 1,435 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.4%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 10, 2019 14/438,672 Affirmed §103
Feb. 25, 2019 14/000,576 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 22, 2019 14/453,722 Reversed N/A
Oct. 25, 2017 13/286,407 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 28, 2017 11/578,284 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 8, 2016 12/343,272 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2016 13/177,179 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 17, 2016 12/599,123 Affirmed §103
Nov. 18, 2015 12/579,847 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.