Examiner Samuel C Kim

Grant ratio: 37.7% (51st percentile in Art Unit 3791 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.15. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 37.7%
Average office actions / grant 3.15
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
94273
Primary art unit
3791
Work group
3790
Technology center
3700
Applications
273
Granted applications
103
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8637
Supervisor
Jacqueline Cheng
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5596

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 104 35.0% 2.08
Group 334 38.9% 2.25
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.57 702 office actions across 273 applications
Applications with office actions 93.4% 255 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 18 6.6%
1 OA 82 30.0%
2 OAs 64 23.4%
3 OAs 39 14.3%
4 OAs 31 11.4%
5+ OAs 39 14.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018: 0.0% 2018 2019: 25.0% 2019 2020: 58.8% 2020 2021: 56.0% 2021 2022: 45.2% 2022 2023: 52.6% 2023 2024: 64.7% 2024 2025: 17.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2018200.0%
201924625.0%
2020342058.8%
2021251456.0%
2022311445.2%
2023382052.6%
2024342264.7%
202541717.1%
20264400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 255 1.6% 3.5% 79.2% 9.4%
Action 2 173 12.7% 4.6% 56.6% 24.9%
Action 3 109 5.5% 1.8% 68.8% 22.0%
Action 4 70 11.4% 2.9% 72.9% 12.9%
Action 5 39 10.3% 0.0% 71.8% 17.9%
Action 6 26 23.1% 0.0% 65.4% 11.5%
Action 7 12 16.7% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 9 11.1% 0.0% 66.7% 22.2%
Action 9 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 12.4% 32 of 258 office actions
All years 7.7% 54 of 702 office actions
Change +4.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.8%
4.3%
11.1%
15.1%
2024: AI examples
13.6%
2025: August memo
11.0%
9.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
6.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 7, 2025 16/499,891 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 11, 2022 15/934,479 Affirmed §103
Mar. 29, 2022 15/521,954 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.