Examiner David E. England

Grant ratio: 47.6% (31st percentile in Art Unit 3992 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 47.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.36
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79451
Primary art unit
3992
Work group
3990
Technology center
3900
Applications
164
Granted applications
78
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3912
Supervisor
Alexander Kosowski
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1367

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 48.5% 2.52
Group 72 56.0% 2.28
Tech Center 70 55.6% 2.30
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.35 386 office actions across 164 applications
Applications with office actions 95.7% 157 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 4.3%
1 OA 66 40.2%
2 OAs 35 21.3%
3 OAs 14 8.5%
4 OAs 23 14.0%
5+ OAs 19 11.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 54.5% 2008 2009: 31.6% 2009 2010: 63.3% 2010 2011: 55.0% 2011 2015: 100.0% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2017: 33.3% 2017 2019: 62.5% 2019 2020: 71.4% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 0.0% 2022 2023: 66.7% 2023 2024: 20.0% 2024 2025: 9.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008221254.5%
200919631.6%
2010301963.3%
2011201155.0%
201511100.0%
20165480.0%
20176233.3%
20198562.5%
20207571.4%
202166100.0%
2022100.0%
20236466.7%
202410220.0%
20251119.1%
20261200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 157 0.0% 16.6% 72.0% 5.1%
Action 2 91 0.0% 12.1% 82.4% 3.3%
Action 3 56 0.0% 8.9% 85.7% 3.6%
Action 4 42 0.0% 7.1% 76.2% 9.5%
Action 5 19 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 10.5%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 55 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 386 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 12, 2011 10/926,641 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 12, 2011 10/032,766 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103
Jun. 6, 2011 10/233,234 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.