Examiner Jonathan S. Lau

Grant ratio: 58.6% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 1623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84090
Primary art unit
1623
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,092
Granted applications
640
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3531
Supervisor
Scarlett Goon
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5241

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 40.5% 1.90
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.89 2,063 office actions across 1,092 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,086 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.5%
1 OA 555 50.8%
2 OAs 303 27.7%
3 OAs 107 9.8%
4 OAs 65 6.0%
5+ OAs 56 5.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 16.2% 2008 2009: 47.5% 2009 2010: 45.1% 2010 2011: 54.5% 2011 2012: 60.3% 2012 2013: 48.8% 2013 2014: 54.1% 2014 2015: 70.4% 2015 2016: 56.9% 2016 2017: 67.1% 2017 2018: 72.6% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 76.8% 2020 2021: 88.1% 2021 2022: 82.4% 2022 2023: 71.9% 2023 2024: 75.9% 2024 2025: 34.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007200.0%
200837616.2%
2009612947.5%
2010512345.1%
2011442454.5%
2012633860.3%
2013412048.8%
2014744054.1%
2015543870.4%
2016724156.9%
2017734967.1%
2018624572.6%
2019724866.7%
2020564376.8%
2021595288.1%
2022514282.4%
2023574171.9%
2024584475.9%
2025501734.0%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,086 0.6% 9.2% 51.7% 7.2%
Action 2 531 0.2% 7.2% 60.6% 9.6%
Action 3 228 0.9% 6.6% 61.8% 9.6%
Action 4 121 1.7% 6.6% 65.3% 10.7%
Action 5 56 0.0% 5.4% 78.6% 5.4%
Action 6 24 0.0% 0.0% 79.2% 4.2%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 2 of 243 office actions
All years 0.5% 11 of 2,063 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.0%
2014: Alice
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
1.9%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 2, 2019 13/392,673 Affirmed §102
Oct. 21, 2016 11/118,613 Affirmed §103
Oct. 11, 2016 12/515,526 Affirmed §103
Jun. 13, 2016 11/639,476 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.