Examiner David Sorkin

Grant ratio: 62.4% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 1774 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.12. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.12
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77501
Primary art unit
1774
Work group
1770
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,232
Granted applications
769
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1148
Supervisor
Claire X Wang
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1051

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 56.3% 1.86
Group 178 50.9% 1.94
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.10 2,588 office actions across 1,232 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 1,220 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 12 1.0%
1 OA 527 42.8%
2 OAs 364 29.5%
3 OAs 145 11.8%
4 OAs 102 8.3%
5+ OAs 82 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 47.5% 2008 2009: 53.0% 2009 2010: 59.2% 2010 2011: 64.0% 2011 2012: 59.5% 2012 2013: 55.2% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 63.5% 2015 2016: 70.4% 2016 2017: 73.1% 2017 2018: 85.5% 2018 2019: 80.9% 2019 2020: 78.5% 2020 2021: 73.9% 2021 2022: 70.7% 2022 2023: 74.6% 2023 2024: 69.6% 2024 2025: 43.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008592847.5%
2009834453.0%
2010714259.2%
2011754864.0%
2012744459.5%
2013874855.2%
2014604066.7%
2015634063.5%
2016715070.4%
2017785773.1%
2018695985.5%
2019685580.9%
2020655178.5%
2021463473.9%
2022412970.7%
2023594474.6%
2024463269.6%
2025552443.6%
20266200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,220 0.7% 25.0% 53.2% 6.6%
Action 2 693 0.6% 21.2% 56.1% 12.6%
Action 3 329 0.3% 18.5% 54.1% 17.6%
Action 4 184 0.5% 16.8% 53.8% 21.2%
Action 5 82 1.2% 11.0% 61.0% 22.0%
Action 6 39 5.1% 7.7% 53.8% 33.3%
Action 7 19 5.3% 15.8% 42.1% 26.3%
Action 8 9 22.2% 0.0% 55.6% 22.2%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 2 of 348 office actions
All years 0.8% 20 of 2,588 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.3%
3.6%
3.0%
2.2%
2024: AI examples
0.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 25. Merits outcomes: 19 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 5/25 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
24.0% 6/25 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 19, 2025 17/373,638 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 22, 2023 15/980,025 Affirmed §103
Jan. 14, 2022 15/457,802 Reversed §103
Sep. 29, 2021 15/012,676 Affirmed §103
Jun. 11, 2019 14/095,885 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2017 14/669,080 Affirmed §103
May. 13, 2016 13/039,905 Reversed §103
Apr. 19, 2016 12/694,396 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Apr. 5, 2016 12/525,796 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 29, 2016 12/924,103 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 29, 2015 11/664,644 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 9, 2015 12/203,614 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.