Examiner Maureen Wallenhorst

Grant ratio: 75.0% (96th percentile in Art Unit 1797 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.47
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
70465
Primary art unit
1797
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,440
Granted applications
1,080
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1266
Supervisor
Michael Marcheschi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1374

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 41 48.0% 1.93
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.47 2,117 office actions across 1,440 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,439 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 960 66.7%
2 OAs 354 24.6%
3 OAs 74 5.1%
4 OAs 35 2.4%
5+ OAs 16 1.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 63.5% 2008 2009: 78.3% 2009 2010: 74.7% 2010 2011: 75.9% 2011 2012: 73.5% 2012 2013: 78.8% 2013 2014: 82.3% 2014 2015: 85.2% 2015 2016: 79.3% 2016 2017: 83.9% 2017 2018: 82.2% 2018 2019: 81.4% 2019 2020: 85.1% 2020 2021: 78.8% 2021 2022: 84.0% 2022 2023: 78.3% 2023 2024: 79.2% 2024 2025: 37.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008523363.5%
2009836578.3%
2010836274.7%
2011796075.9%
2012836173.5%
2013806378.8%
2014967982.3%
2015887585.2%
2016927379.3%
2017937883.9%
2018907482.2%
2019867081.4%
2020675785.1%
2021806378.8%
2022756384.0%
2023463678.3%
2024534279.2%
2025702637.1%
20264400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,439 3.5% 6.3% 55.9% 26.1%
Action 2 479 11.5% 16.5% 63.7% 7.1%
Action 3 125 20.0% 10.4% 57.6% 8.8%
Action 4 51 23.5% 5.9% 60.8% 7.8%
Action 5 16 6.3% 6.3% 81.3% 6.3%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 9.1% 22 of 242 office actions
All years 6.8% 143 of 2,117 office actions
Change +2.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
1.8%
15.8%
6.1%
2014: Alice
8.0%
3.9%
5.5%
3.5%
2.8%
2019: PEG
12.9%
13.4%
10.7%
11.5%
9.0%
2024: AI examples
8.6%
2025: August memo
8.0%
14.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2020 15/586,737 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 5, 2018 14/891,397 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 26, 2015 12/992,309 Affirmed N/A
May. 10, 2011 11/050,766 Affirmed §103
Aug. 24, 2010 11/199,488 Reversed §112
Mar. 29, 2010 11/501,375 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.