Examiner Yelena G. Gakh, Ph.D

Grant ratio: 43.3% (27th percentile in Art Unit 1797 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.12. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2017
Grant ratio 43.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.12
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78018
Primary art unit
1797
Work group
1790
Technology center
1700
Applications
490
Granted applications
212

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 41 48.0% 1.93
Group 303 36.3% 2.12
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.36 1,159 office actions across 491 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 491 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 181 36.9%
2 OAs 149 30.3%
3 OAs 69 14.1%
4 OAs 45 9.2%
5+ OAs 47 9.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 39.1% 2008 2009: 43.6% 2009 2010: 34.9% 2010 2011: 53.2% 2011 2012: 58.0% 2012 2013: 36.2% 2013 2014: 25.5% 2014 2015: 50.9% 2015 2016: 45.8% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008461839.1%
2009552443.6%
2010431534.9%
2011472553.2%
2012502958.0%
2013582136.2%
2014551425.5%
2015572950.9%
2016592745.8%
2017201050.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 491 1.4% 11.2% 63.7% 15.7%
Action 2 310 1.0% 4.2% 47.1% 46.1%
Action 3 161 0.0% 0.6% 47.8% 49.7%
Action 4 92 1.1% 2.2% 51.1% 45.7%
Action 5 47 0.0% 2.1% 36.2% 61.7%
Action 6 29 0.0% 6.9% 24.1% 69.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 71.4%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 55.6%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.9% 11 of 1,159 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.5%
0.7%
2.6%
0.0%
2.7%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 8/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.0% 11/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 22, 2018 13/231,866 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 2, 2018 12/382,979 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
May. 30, 2018 12/964,710 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 24, 2017 13/498,707 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 14, 2017 10/332,955 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
May. 31, 2017 13/160,714 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
May. 31, 2017 12/742,893 Reversed §103
Mar. 22, 2017 12/939,996 Affirmed §103 · §120
Mar. 7, 2017 12/239,449 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jul. 20, 2016 11/809,067 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 9, 2015 12/874,324 Affirmed §103
Jan. 31, 2014 10/880,750 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.