Examiner Paul Yanchus Iii

Grant ratio: 77.0% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2116 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.75
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79692
Primary art unit
2116
Work group
2110
Technology center
2100
Applications
868
Granted applications
668
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3678
Supervisor
Thomas Lee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3667

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 64.4% 1.81
Group 214 64.2% 1.69
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.75 1,517 office actions across 868 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 864 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.5%
1 OA 483 55.6%
2 OAs 221 25.5%
3 OAs 92 10.6%
4 OAs 43 5.0%
5+ OAs 25 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 73.3% 2008 2009: 84.1% 2009 2010: 70.7% 2010 2011: 63.4% 2011 2012: 83.7% 2012 2013: 85.9% 2013 2014: 76.1% 2014 2015: 92.2% 2015 2016: 89.1% 2016 2017: 75.6% 2017 2018: 78.0% 2018 2019: 84.6% 2019 2020: 91.7% 2020 2021: 83.0% 2021 2022: 89.7% 2022 2023: 88.0% 2023 2024: 86.5% 2024 2025: 39.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008151173.3%
2009443784.1%
2010412970.7%
2011412663.4%
2012494183.7%
2013716185.9%
2014463576.1%
2015514792.2%
2016554989.1%
2017453475.6%
2018503978.0%
2019524484.6%
2020484491.7%
2021473983.0%
2022393589.7%
2023504488.0%
2024373286.5%
2025532139.6%
20263400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 864 1.5% 10.4% 80.2% 1.5%
Action 2 381 2.6% 4.5% 84.8% 1.3%
Action 3 160 3.8% 7.5% 86.3% 1.3%
Action 4 68 2.9% 1.5% 83.8% 5.9%
Action 5 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 4.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.0% 10 of 200 office actions
All years 2.0% 31 of 1,517 office actions
Change +3.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.6%
1.5%
0.0%
1.1%
0.9%
1.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
7.1%
6.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
2024: AI examples
1.9%
2025: August memo
3.8%
11.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 4, 2017 14/444,281 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Feb. 25, 2015 11/934,947 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.