Examiner Lizbeth Torres-Diaz

Grant ratio: 72.0% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2495 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.27. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 72.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.27
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89553
Primary art unit
2495
Work group
2490
Technology center
2400
Applications
322
Granted applications
232
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1787
Supervisor
Hosain T Alam
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3978

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 64.7% 2.08
Group 198 61.4% 2.06
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.27 730 office actions across 322 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 322 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 126 39.1%
2 OAs 96 29.8%
3 OAs 40 12.4%
4 OAs 31 9.6%
5+ OAs 29 9.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 76.9% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 58.8% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2017: 56.5% 2017 2018: 81.5% 2018 2019: 63.2% 2019 2020: 90.5% 2020 2021: 93.5% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 95.8% 2023 2024: 76.0% 2024 2025: 43.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013131076.9%
2014282071.4%
2015171058.8%
2016201575.0%
2017231356.5%
2018272281.5%
2019191263.2%
2020211990.5%
2021312993.5%
2022282692.9%
2023242395.8%
2024251976.0%
2025321443.8%
20261400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 322 3.1% 5.6% 77.6% 10.2%
Action 2 196 2.0% 2.6% 90.3% 1.5%
Action 3 100 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 2.0%
Action 4 60 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 0.0%
Action 5 29 0.0% 0.0% 93.1% 6.9%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 2 of 131 office actions
All years 1.9% 14 of 730 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
9.8%
2014: Alice
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.9%
6.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 3, 2023 15/884,747 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 13, 2021 15/280,954 Affirmed N/A
May. 27, 2021 14/388,746 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jun. 12, 2017 12/298,731 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
May. 30, 2017 13/849,525 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.