Examiner Frank S Chen

Grant ratio: 74.0% (68th percentile in Art Unit 2611 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.72
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88885
Primary art unit
2611
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
685
Granted applications
507
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7993
Supervisor
Kee Tung
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7794

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 48.8% 1.87
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 1,172 office actions across 685 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 680 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.7%
1 OA 428 62.5%
2 OAs 146 21.3%
3 OAs 48 7.0%
4 OAs 28 4.1%
5+ OAs 30 4.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 20.0% 2012 2013: 77.5% 2013 2014: 80.0% 2014 2015: 86.1% 2015 2016: 65.1% 2016 2017: 56.4% 2017 2018: 66.0% 2018 2019: 77.4% 2019 2020: 90.9% 2020 2021: 97.0% 2021 2022: 89.7% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 92.0% 2024 2025: 48.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
201210220.0%
2013403177.5%
2014352880.0%
2015363186.1%
2016432865.1%
2017392256.4%
2018473166.0%
2019534177.4%
2020555090.9%
2021666497.0%
2022686189.7%
2023564987.5%
2024504692.0%
2025452248.9%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 680 5.7% 2.8% 72.4% 6.2%
Action 2 252 3.6% 4.4% 85.3% 2.8%
Action 3 106 3.8% 1.9% 93.4% 0.9%
Action 4 58 3.4% 0.0% 94.8% 1.7%
Action 5 30 3.3% 0.0% 93.3% 3.3%
Action 6 17 5.9% 0.0% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.5% 20 of 191 office actions
All years 4.8% 56 of 1,172 office actions
Change +5.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.9%
2.5%
8.7%
4.6%
6.5%
2019: PEG
2.3%
5.4%
3.0%
4.7%
7.2%
2024: AI examples
3.6%
2025: August memo
18.5%
5.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 21, 2023 16/886,382 Reversed §103
Jul. 20, 2020 14/923,293 Reversed §103 · §112
May. 29, 2020 15/256,218 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 22, 2018 14/576,527 Affirmed §103
May. 4, 2017 13/338,888 Reversed §103
May. 23, 2016 13/173,411 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.