Examiner Jitesh Patel

Grant ratio: 69.1% (65th percentile in Art Unit 2612 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86949
Primary art unit
2612
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
433
Granted applications
299
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3313
Supervisor
Said A. Broome
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2931

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 45 52.0% 1.75
Group 291 49.1% 1.92
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.95 845 office actions across 433 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 431 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.5%
1 OA 252 58.2%
2 OAs 72 16.6%
3 OAs 46 10.6%
4 OAs 29 6.7%
5+ OAs 32 7.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 37.5% 2014 2015: 17.4% 2015 2016: 54.2% 2016 2017: 56.5% 2017 2018: 79.5% 2018 2019: 88.4% 2019 2020: 80.0% 2020 2021: 94.7% 2021 2022: 90.7% 2022 2023: 95.0% 2023 2024: 92.1% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013300.0%
201416637.5%
201523417.4%
2016241354.2%
2017231356.5%
2018393179.5%
2019433888.4%
2020352880.0%
2021383694.7%
2022433990.7%
2023403895.0%
2024383592.1%
2025331854.5%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 431 2.3% 0.5% 83.8% 5.3%
Action 2 179 1.7% 1.1% 88.8% 3.9%
Action 3 107 0.9% 0.0% 88.8% 9.3%
Action 4 61 0.0% 0.0% 91.8% 4.9%
Action 5 32 0.0% 3.1% 93.8% 3.1%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 5.9%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.8% 4 of 144 office actions
All years 1.7% 14 of 845 office actions
Change +1.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
3.4%
1.3%
2019: PEG
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
1.9%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
5.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 18, 2022 16/374,772 Affirmed §103 · §120
Nov. 3, 2020 15/522,648 Affirmed §103
Jun. 5, 2020 15/095,571 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jan. 31, 2019 14/225,806 Affirmed §103
Mar. 23, 2017 13/713,603 Reversed §103
Feb. 28, 2017 13/384,642 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 1, 2017 13/667,905 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.