Examiner Kim Thanh T. Tran

Grant ratio: 70.7% (77th percentile in Art Unit 2612 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.44. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 70.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.44
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88053
Primary art unit
2612
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
389
Granted applications
275
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1408
Supervisor
Alicia Harrington
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2330

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 45 51.7% 1.75
Group 292 48.6% 1.92
Tech Center 1,759 56.9% 1.88
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 944 office actions across 389 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 389 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 152 39.1%
2 OAs 95 24.4%
3 OAs 54 13.9%
4 OAs 40 10.3%
5+ OAs 48 12.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 54.3% 2013 2014: 79.2% 2014 2015: 76.5% 2015 2016: 53.8% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2019: 75.7% 2019 2020: 90.9% 2020 2021: 90.9% 2021 2022: 76.2% 2022 2023: 80.6% 2023 2024: 80.8% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20116350.0%
201212866.7%
2013351954.3%
2014241979.2%
2015171376.5%
2016261453.8%
2017362775.0%
20182323100.0%
2019372875.7%
2020333090.9%
2021222090.9%
2022211676.2%
2023312580.6%
2024262180.8%
202518950.0%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 389 0.8% 2.8% 88.4% 1.0%
Action 2 237 0.0% 3.4% 89.5% 0.8%
Action 3 142 0.0% 2.8% 91.5% 0.7%
Action 4 88 3.4% 5.7% 85.2% 0.0%
Action 5 48 2.1% 0.0% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 6 23 8.7% 0.0% 87.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 1 of 100 office actions
All years 1.0% 9 of 944 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
3.3%
3.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
3.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 4, 2021 15/209,519 Reversed §103
May. 19, 2021 15/764,778 Affirmed §103
May. 19, 2020 15/209,527 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 4, 2019 13/977,793 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 28, 2019 13/178,127 Affirmed §103
Feb. 21, 2017 13/732,646 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 8, 2016 12/898,624 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.