Examiner Scott E. Sonners

Grant ratio: 62.0% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 2613 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 62.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.25
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86021
Primary art unit
2613
Work group
2610
Technology center
2600
Applications
413
Granted applications
256
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7504
Supervisor
Xiao Wu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7761

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 47.4% 1.81
Group 292 48.5% 1.92
Tech Center 1,763 56.6% 1.88
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.51 1,038 office actions across 413 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 412 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 168 40.7%
2 OAs 95 23.0%
3 OAs 52 12.6%
4 OAs 44 10.7%
5+ OAs 53 12.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 61.1% 2009 2010: 69.0% 2010 2011: 84.2% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 48.0% 2015 2016: 53.8% 2016 2017: 36.0% 2017 2018: 71.4% 2018 2019: 72.4% 2019 2020: 78.9% 2020 2021: 73.7% 2021 2022: 78.6% 2022 2023: 90.0% 2023 2024: 72.7% 2024 2025: 26.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2009181161.1%
2010292069.0%
2011383284.2%
2012181266.7%
2013191684.2%
201412650.0%
2015251248.0%
201613753.8%
201725936.0%
2018282071.4%
2019292172.4%
2020191578.9%
2021191473.7%
2022282278.6%
2023201890.0%
2024221672.7%
202519526.3%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 412 1.2% 23.1% 61.9% 7.0%
Action 2 244 8.6% 27.0% 41.4% 16.4%
Action 3 149 2.7% 29.5% 53.0% 11.4%
Action 4 97 2.1% 18.6% 61.9% 7.2%
Action 5 53 0.0% 18.9% 71.7% 7.5%
Action 6 35 0.0% 17.1% 68.6% 14.3%
Action 7 17 0.0% 35.3% 64.7% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 10 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 2 of 137 office actions
All years 3.2% 33 of 1,038 office actions
Change -1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

20.0%
6.2%
5.6%
10.9%
9.5%
7.1%
2014: Alice
3.0%
1.5%
2.5%
2.5%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.3%
2025: August memo
2.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 3, 2022 16/184,083 Affirmed §103
Dec. 23, 2021 15/964,687 Affirmed §103
Sep. 4, 2020 14/202,722 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103
Jun. 13, 2014 11/553,199 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 2, 2014 11/736,070 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.