Examiner Yong H. Sim

Grant ratio: 51.4% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2621 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2018
Grant ratio 51.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82545
Primary art unit
2621
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
362
Granted applications
186

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 44.4% 2.21
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.71 1,066 office actions across 393 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 393 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 103 26.2%
2 OAs 118 30.0%
3 OAs 60 15.3%
4 OAs 60 15.3%
5+ OAs 52 13.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.1% 2008 2009: 28.3% 2009 2010: 28.6% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 57.1% 2013 2014: 63.6% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 59.5% 2016 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 82.6% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200828932.1%
2009461328.3%
20107228.6%
2011422150.0%
2012442250.0%
2013352057.1%
2014332163.6%
2015321650.0%
2016372259.5%
2017352160.0%
2018231982.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 393 0.3% 10.9% 86.5% 0.8%
Action 2 290 1.4% 7.9% 89.3% 1.0%
Action 3 172 0.0% 5.2% 94.2% 0.0%
Action 4 112 0.0% 1.8% 95.5% 2.7%
Action 5 52 0.0% 5.8% 94.2% 0.0%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 93.1% 3.4%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 5 of 1,066 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
1.2%
2014: Alice
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 22. Merits outcomes: 16 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
27.3% 6/22 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
27.3% 6/22 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 24, 2020 14/991,397 Reversed §103
Nov. 4, 2019 14/465,725 Reversed §103
Apr. 17, 2019 15/071,561 Affirmed §103
Jan. 23, 2019 14/978,442 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2018 11/057,050 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2017 12/242,215 Affirmed §103
Aug. 23, 2016 12/822,828 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 27, 2016 11/828,923 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2016 12/242,864 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 9, 2015 12/462,300 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 22, 2015 12/479,573 Reversed N/A
Jan. 30, 2015 11/830,784 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.